Category: Uncategorized

from Peter Pham

Every year I process the work for each Student Design Show, I make note of the trends that appear among the submissions each year. Certain work is consistently submitted, while other categories seem to ‘ebb and flow.’ It is an interesting snapshot of trends for that particular year.

A few facts about this year’s show:

• Around 200 pieces were submitted this year. [We’ve had in excess of 300 in a very active year with high enrollments, and as low as 150]
• Qualifying student work was to have been created between Spring of 2024 (not previously submitted) through April , 2025. It may be selected from student coursework, or from parallel individual practice to coursework.
• All Categories needed to be made up of minimally 5 submissions to remain “competitive.” Where more than 5 submissions were not received, that category was merged with another similar or like category. (Since the Districtwide Student Design Show began in 1999, we have had anywhere between 7 and 14 categories in a given annual show). This years final consolidated categories came to 10 categories.
• This year’s categorical submissions (from MOST submissions in a category to the least) were:  

1. LAYOUT and LOGOS and IDENTITY (merged category) (~21%)
2. DIGITAL ILLUSTRATION (~13%)
3. 3D & Packaging (~13%)
4. POSTERS (~12%)
5. PHOTOGRAPHY: “Straight-out-of-the -Camera” (~9%)
6. MULTIMEDIA [film/video, presentations, simple games, motion graphics](~9%)
7. COMPREHENSIVE CAMPAIGNS (~8%)
8. WEB [sites, prototypes, static web items] (~6%)
9. TRADITIONAL MEDIA (~6%)
10. PHOTOGRAPHY: combined Photomanipulation and Edited images (~3%)
    

• LAYOUT [combined with Logos and Identity] had the top slot. This hearkens back to the early 2000’s, where Layout categories were the top.
• Digital Illustration and Posters have frequently occupied spaces within the top 5 slots.
  Again, this seems to be what most folks commonly associate with “graphic design” as a practical discipline. The reality is most entry-level jobs are related to Layout, and the plethora of design-related jobs is (now more than ever) in high parity.
• Photography in GENERAL has dropped significantly from its heyday on the 2010’s, where it consistently occupied the top slots, and spawned the DIGITAL PHOTIOGRAPHY certificate.
• Traditional Illustration media , which was for many years near the top, has fallen off to a slot near the bottom. This is interesting since it is also associated with what most people would consider a major part of graphic design.many people have considered “art” or design. It is probably more a recognition of the communicative aspects of graphic design.
• Video and Multimedia has risen to an ALL-TIME-HIGH in submissions! This may correlate with a borders understanding of the communicative aspects of design.

This is a callout to anyone attending the RECEPTION Thursday Evening to please consider sharing your PHOTOS and IMAGES with the show site. Contact Peter Pham [phampete@gtc.edu] to help share your images from the event!

Don’t keep your amazing photos to yourself! Share your photos with us!
We’d love to see your unique perspectives and favorite moments!

We have two videos to share with everyone from the setup day (pre-show walkthrough) as well as the Awards Ceremony and Reception night.

---

We’re sharing images from the SDS 2023 Awards Reception on this site.
If you have any images that you would like to share with us, Please contact one of the instructors and share any photos or videos from the show that we can in turn share with everyone!

Susan LaCanne lacannes@gtc.edu
Laura Laznicka laznickal@gtc.edu
Peter Pham phampete@gtc.edu

In addition to the folks who have contributed their work and talent to the show (and their families and supporters), we’d like to extend thanks to others who helped us make this years “comeback” show a success.

2023 Design Show

The 204 GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM is going to be changing to the 201 GRAPHIC DESIGN PROGRAM.

Please keep this in mind as you select your classes and do your planning with Advisors.
Mrs. Sue LaCanne has made a Panopto video on this topic .

A single/continuous shot walk-through of the iMET CENTER during a quiet moment
before our upcoming STUDENT DESIGN SHOW.
We hope to see everyone and their supporter there.

from Peter Pham

As I process the work for each year’s Student Design Show, I muse at the trends that appear among the submissions each year.

In the early 2000’s (when the analytics were not as easily processed and quantified) there was a definite preponderance of Layout and Illustration student work. It had been a mainstay of our program from its inception, and oft-associated with the practice of graphic design.

In the 2010’s, we saw a tremendous increase in the amount of photography work––possibly correlating with the increased availability of really good consumer digital equipment… and a notable trend towards people becoming more interested in creating high quality products for a variety of uses outside of the traditional scope.

It appears that everything old is new again.
Much like the late 1990’s and early 2000’s, illustration, posters, and layout is at the top of our list this year! Items associated with traditional print-media categories are making up teh vast majority of submissions… with traditional illustration coming in right behind them.

While Graphic Design is not necessarily synonymous with illustration, (and definitely not in the same category as Fine Art) the crossover point emphasized by volume of entries is worth noting.

A few facts about this year’s show:

• Around 160 pieces were submitted this year. [We’ve had in excess of 300 in a very active year with high enrollments]
• Qualifying student work was to have been created between Spring of 2022 through April , 2023.
  It may be selected from student coursework, or from parallel individual practice to coursework.
• Categories needed to be made up of minimally 5 submissions, or that category was closed and merged with another. (Since the Districtwide Student Design Show began in 1999, we have had anywhere between 7 and 14 categories in a given annual show).
• This year’s categorical submissions (from MOST submissions in a category to the least) were:  

1. DIGITAL ILLUSTRATION (21%)
2. POSTERS (18%)
3. LAYOUT (13%)
4. TRADITIONAL ILLUSTRATION (12%)
5. LOGOS/ IDENTITY/ CAMPAIGN COMBINED CATEGORY (~9%)
6. EDITED PHOTOGRAPHY (9%)
7. UNEDITED PHOTOGRAPHY (6%)
8. 3D/ PACKAGING (5%)
9. MULTIMEDIA/WEB (4%)
10. PHOTO MANIPULATION (3%)